Moptop Bee Gees
Folkie Bee Gees
Studio Bee Gees
Boogie Bee Gees
Disco Bee Gees
Talk Show Bee Gees

The Daily News has an article in Friday’s paper about how the New York City Department of Education is making plans to lay off 4,100 teachers, while spending over $1,000,000,000 on outside consultants. (And oh, by the way, sometimes the consultants the D.O.E. hires aren’t even Americans.)
Of course this shows just how corrupt Mayor Bloomberg is, as he single-handedly controls the D.O.E. (a change he insisted on a few years ago). In effect, he is funneling public tax monies into the hands of private concerns.
How do New Yorkers feel about it? Well, the News has put an inset poll adjacent to their article. It asks, “Do you think $1 billion is too much for the city to spend on consultants?” As of this writing, fully 96% have answered “Yes, that seems outrageous. The money would be much better spent on keeping teachers in the classroom.”
Isn’t someone who’s elected supposed to pay at least some attention to the will of the people?
Bret Easton Ellis tweeted thusly:
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Times has come out with a story on school “reform”. I admit I haven’t finished reading this multi-page piece, but so far, a few things have jumped out at me. Some odd things within:
New York Times on former Chancellor Joel Klein: When Klein started, for instance, less than 50 percent of New York’s incoming high-school freshmen were graduating in four years. That number is now 63 percent.
The explanation for this is pretty simple: under Klein, the city’s high schools were encouraged to practice grade inflation, and to rubber-stamp diplomas. But there is no mention of this in the article. Do you imagine that the New York Times has no idea of this widespread practice that most teachers in the system bemoan loudly and frequently? Guess again.
On “innovation”: Individual schools … were expected to earn good grades on their report cards from the city — another Klein innovation — or risk closure.
So now, schools that expel troubled kids (or never accept them at all) will exhibit “improved” student learning, and earn better grades on their city report cards. I student-taught in a school that took any child. And even if they were sent to juvy, the school would really work to get that kid back in the school after their time was served. That school is being closed due to Klein’s “innovations”, while schools that have expelled many are painted as “success” stories. Please.
On “bold policies”: Klein’s successor, Cathleen Black, made it clear that she planned to continue the bold policies that he started implementing after his appointment by Mayor Bloomberg in 2002.
Why does the Times neglect to mention that Cathie Black had a 17% approval rating before she resigned? I mean 17%?? They believe this is not relevant information?
Well, hopefully, the Times will address some of these things later in the piece, but from their previous ridiculously biased education “reporting”, I won’t be holding my breath. (I’ll probably continue reading and commenting in later posts.)
On MSNBC, Michele Borba, “Educational Psychologist”, says teachers should be in the halls to herd kids into their classrooms. Well, how do you do all the things you are required to do like: write your Aim, Agenda, and Do Now instructions on the board, put your materials where they need to be (remember – most teachers do not have their own classrooms – they are coming into the classroom at the same time as the students), set up your overhead and/or unlock the calculators or set up any other equipment you’ll be using for the lesson, oh and also keep your eyes on the students who are inside the classroom (you are responsible for the students’ safety when they are in the classroom) – when you are STANDING OUT IN THE HALL?
Borba is completely illogical and she is either being disingenuous and simply spouting a party line that does not support teachers, or my guess is she couldn’t teach her way out of a paper bag.
Also, is it efficient and economically responsible to pay people who hold master’s degrees (and sometimes even doctorates) to act as hall monitors, when they have been hired to perform educational tasks – you know, like TEACHING?
McChrystal bane Michael Hastings tweets this to our attention: The Terrorist Consequences of the Libyan Intervention by Paul R. Pillar at The National Interest Blog
Excerpts:
…we should remember that anything done to Qaddafi is being done to someone who had given up terrorism.
…think about the lessons that will be drawn if someone who gave up not only terrorism but also his unconventional weapons programs in return for normal relations and acceptance in the international community is made a target for regime change. The lesson that the mullahs in Tehran and others will draw is that it would be useless to reach any agreement with the West about terrorism or nuclear weapons because the West is really interested above all in regime change and, regardless of any agreements that may have been reached, will seize the first opportunity that comes along to try to realize that goal.
————————————————-
So, in other words, why would any current leaders work towards security and peace with the West; why bother with diplomacy when we’ll bomb them the first chance we get anyway? And why give up weapons of mass destruction when we ask, if we are just going to attack them after they do. This Libyan War, oh excuse me, I mean this Libyan Time-Limited, Scope-Limited Military Action (in White House-speak), may send exactly the wrong message about our trustworthiness as a partner and our ability to enact change through diplomacy, to those in power whom we would liked to have influenced.
Denmark has found Mohamed Geele, a Somali man, guilty of terrorism for using an ax to break into the home of Kurt Westergaard, a political cartoonist who had drawn Mohammed. While Geele was attempting to break in, Westergaard was able to save himself by locking himself in a room.
Westergaard’s work was one of 12 drawings of Mohammed published by a newspaper in 2005, that triggered violent protests across the Muslim world. The assault on Westergaard’s life occurred in 2010.
The prosecutor argued that the Geele intended to kill Westergaard and aimed to “seriously frighten the population” and destabilize Denmark. The court also found the terrorist guilty of attempted murder of Westergaard, attempted murder of a policeman, and an attack with an axe on another police officer.
.

.
-some info from MSNBC and A.P.
.